Discuss CommFT: Top Ten NA Rankings - Feb 2010 http://communityfortress.com/tf2/league-coverage/commft-top-ten-na-rankings-feb-2010.php Mon, 06 Sep 2010 19:30:09 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://communityfortress.com/tf2/league-coverage/commft-top-ten-na-rankings-feb-2010.php#comment-478 I put eMg over a couple of teams. killing Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:07:18 +0100 http://communityfortress.com/tf2/league-coverage/commft-top-ten-na-rankings-feb-2010.php#comment-475 rofl ouch slardel Sun, 14 Feb 2010 09:24:13 +0100 http://communityfortress.com/tf2/league-coverage/commft-top-ten-na-rankings-feb-2010.php#comment-474 my list: 1st coL 2nd EG 3rd Pandemic 4th MmM 5th blight 6th eMg 7th AG 8th vires 9th Loaded 10th dynamic sting Sun, 14 Feb 2010 07:07:19 +0100 http://communityfortress.com/tf2/league-coverage/commft-top-ten-na-rankings-feb-2010.php#comment-473 something is wrong with the arithmetic here if 17 out of 18 voted coL as number 1, then they get 170, plus the extra 7 from the guy who voted them 3rd. for EG, though, since their lowest position is 2, they should have at least 162 pts because all 18 voted them 2nd... yet it says that their highest ranking was 1, which would give them another 10 pts on top of this 162... but its impossible that they could have been voted 1st by someone beacuse all 18 voted for either coL or MMM as number 1. yet they only have 160 in the article. that doesn't add up. wanderrful Sun, 14 Feb 2010 06:05:55 +0100 http://communityfortress.com/tf2/league-coverage/commft-top-ten-na-rankings-feb-2010.php#comment-471 Nice article It is good to see ESEA and a couple other organizations help the top 4 all make it to Dallas. If all 4 teams make it we are in store for some epic games pyyyour Sun, 14 Feb 2010 05:17:36 +0100 http://communityfortress.com/tf2/league-coverage/commft-top-ten-na-rankings-feb-2010.php#comment-470 #14 I didn't play in any esea matches in place of stam. DL_ Sun, 14 Feb 2010 03:53:16 +0100 http://communityfortress.com/tf2/league-coverage/commft-top-ten-na-rankings-feb-2010.php#comment-468 my list - col, mmm, eg, pand, blight, dynamic, loaded, emg, ag, vires #8 obviously wasnt the emg people :P blaze Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:12:20 +0100 http://communityfortress.com/tf2/league-coverage/commft-top-ten-na-rankings-feb-2010.php#comment-466 Like I said before cbear is one of the best soldiers around, so yes, having him instead of warped does make a difference also in some games dlman played instead of stamjally Pandemic may be above mmm but their scouts are so inconsistent. Some games they play as good as carnage and enigma and other games they just suck. MMM scouts are consistent but not quite as good as justin and fanom when they are doing well. Stamjally needs to pick it up, bloodsire is outdoing him. EG scouts need to pick it up too. Cyzer and syckness are being very average. Destro is being average too. I think Pandemic will be the dark horse in these playoffs runtime Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:48:02 +0100 http://communityfortress.com/tf2/league-coverage/commft-top-ten-na-rankings-feb-2010.php#comment-456 I wanted to keep all the specific lists confidential just to keep them away from trolls. But if they want to post their own list like cbear did, feel free to do that. For the record, nobody, imo, rated their own team too high. djfivenine Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:00:51 +0100 http://communityfortress.com/tf2/league-coverage/commft-top-ten-na-rankings-feb-2010.php#comment-453 #12: the personal reason why i didn't rank open teams over any invite teams was because every team that has gone from Open to Invite, apart from the first group in Season 2->3, has either finished in at most mediocirty amongst the big 4 (5 actually since Pandemic is here again) or just disbanded. wanderrful Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:44:01 +0100 http://communityfortress.com/tf2/league-coverage/commft-top-ten-na-rankings-feb-2010.php#comment-452 Seems to be a strange tendency to not rank open teams past Invite teams when, from what I hear, eMg is fairly dominant against both Loaded and Dynamic in scrims. Duck Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:41:53 +0100 http://communityfortress.com/tf2/league-coverage/commft-top-ten-na-rankings-feb-2010.php#comment-451 Some of the people that were asked for these rankings are a joke and it shows where some people got ranked for Highest/Lowest Pandemic - Highest 3rd/Lowest 7th really? hahahaha, the clear 3rd best team gets voted 7th once(maybe more?) They receive no first place votes since TLR obviously didn't wanna be biased and vote his team 1st I do think the bottom 3 are dead on accurate right now and Loaded is dead so they won't be on the next rankings but Dynamic and Blight are both placed properly. Can't wait for March's rankings cMw Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:18:45 +0100 http://communityfortress.com/tf2/league-coverage/commft-top-ten-na-rankings-feb-2010.php#comment-450 Hmm, I knew I forgot to send this to you before I left, DJ. Anyways, it would've mattered, mine was exactly the same except 9 and 10 being switched. Fzero Sat, 13 Feb 2010 07:12:08 +0100 http://communityfortress.com/tf2/league-coverage/commft-top-ten-na-rankings-feb-2010.php#comment-449 Nice to see a top 10 American list out. Thanks for that DJ. -#2, we played cbear in out gravelpit alienware match. -Pretty sure eMg voted for MmM to be the #1 team. -Besides a few things, I think the standings are pretty accurate. -#7 I think Loaded slightly below Dynamic is a pretty good spot. Dynamic has a lot of potential and has shown it in a few games this season. Kermit Sat, 13 Feb 2010 06:14:02 +0100 http://communityfortress.com/tf2/league-coverage/commft-top-ten-na-rankings-feb-2010.php#comment-447 Loaded below Dynamic is an interesting result, though considering the signs are pointing towards Loaded breaking up, they could have even dropped lower. eXtine Sat, 13 Feb 2010 06:08:54 +0100 http://communityfortress.com/tf2/league-coverage/commft-top-ten-na-rankings-feb-2010.php#comment-446 Who the hell voted complexity 3rd? ehFk Sat, 13 Feb 2010 06:06:00 +0100 http://communityfortress.com/tf2/league-coverage/commft-top-ten-na-rankings-feb-2010.php#comment-445 good rankings, i'd place Pandemic above MmM but other then that :) K2_ Sat, 13 Feb 2010 05:47:32 +0100 http://communityfortress.com/tf2/league-coverage/commft-top-ten-na-rankings-feb-2010.php#comment-444 i voted pandemic 3rd nice list bud, who picked mmm first? lol edit: my list --- col eg pand mmm dynamic blight emg loaded ag detox bear Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:12:45 +0100 http://communityfortress.com/tf2/league-coverage/commft-top-ten-na-rankings-feb-2010.php#comment-443 what's the third excuse for the loss on yukon: 1. didn't play map since last season. 2. cbear was playing (godlike). 3. ??? cbear is good, but game changing? onetouch- Fri, 12 Feb 2010 23:28:54 +0100 http://communityfortress.com/tf2/league-coverage/commft-top-ten-na-rankings-feb-2010.php#comment-442 pandemic hasn't played against the starting mmm roster (cbear) Jaeger Fri, 12 Feb 2010 23:23:04 +0100 http://communityfortress.com/tf2/league-coverage/commft-top-ten-na-rankings-feb-2010.php#comment-441 mmm is 1-2 against pandemic in esea, and 1-3 on the season with losses on badlands, granary, and gravelpit (alienware) and a win on turbine. onetouch- Fri, 12 Feb 2010 23:14:05 +0100